Lord Linlithgow's initial refusal to discuss postwar
plan with the Congress left any political prospects other than those it could
win by noncooperation or violence. Soon after Japan joined the Axis powers in
late 1941, and moved with such rapidity into most of Southeast Asia,
Churchill's war Cabinet, fearing the imminent possibility of a Japanese
invasion of India, sent the socialist Sir Stafford Cripps, a close personal
friend of Nehru, to New Delhi with a postwar proposal in March 1942.
The Cripps Mission offered Indian politicians full
"dominion status" for India after the war's end, with the additional
stipulation, as a concession primarily to the Muslim League, that any province
could vote to "opt out" of such a dominion if it preferred to do so.
Mahatma Gandhi irately called the offer "a
post-dated cheque on a bank that was failing," and Nehru was equally
negative and angry at Cripps for his readiness to give so much to the Muslims.
Cripps's hands had been tied by Churchill before he
left London, however, as he was ordered by the war Cabinet merely to convey the
British offer, not to modify it or negotiate a new formula. He flew home
empty-handed in less than a month, and soon afterward Mahatma Gandhi planned his
last satyagraha campaign, the "Quit India" movement.
Declaring that the British presence in India was a
provocation to the Japanese, the Mahatma called upon the British to "quit
India" and to leave Indians to deal with the Japanese by nonviolent means,
but the Mahatma and all members of the Congress high command were arrested
before the dawn of that movement in August 1942.
In a few months at least 60,000 Indians filled
British prison cells, and the raj unleashed massive force against Indian
underground efforts to disrupt rail transport and to generally subvert the war
effort that followed the crackdown on the Quit India campaign. Parts of the
United Provinces, Bihar, the North-West Frontier, and Bengal were bombed and
strafed by British pilots as the raj resolved to crush all Indian resistance
and violent opposition as swiftly as possible.
Many Indians were killed and wounded, but wartime
resistance continued as more young Indians, women as well as men, were
recruited into Congress' underground. Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in
December 1941 brought the United States into the war as Britain's most powerful
ally. By late 1942 and throughout the rest of the war, U.S. arms and planes
steamed and flew into Calcutta and Bombay, bolstering British India as the
major Allied launching pad against Japanese forces in Southeast Asia and China.
The British raj thus remained firm despite growing Indian opposition, both
violent and nonviolent. Indian industry grew rapidly, moreover, during World
War II. Electric power output doubled, and Jamshedpur became the British
Empire's foremost producer of steel by the war's end. Indian shipyards and
light-manufacturing plants flourished in Bombay, as well as in Bengal and
Orissa, and, despite many warnings, the Japanese never launched air attacks
against Calcutta or Madras.
In mid-1943, Field Marshal Lord Wavell, who replaced
Linlithgow as viceroy (1943-47), brought India's government fully under martial
control for the war's duration. No progress was made in several of the Congress'
attempts to resolve Hindu-Muslim differences through talks between Mahatma
Gandhi and Jinnah. Soon after the war's end in Europe, Wavell convened a
political conference in Shimla in late June 1945, but there was no meeting of
minds, no formula sturdy enough to bridge the gulf between the Congress and the
Muslim League.
Two weeks after the Shimla talks collapsed in
midsummer, Churchill's government was voted out of power by the Labour Party's
sweep of London's polls, and Prime Minister Clement Attlee appointed one of
Mahatma Gandhi's old admirers, Lord Petrick-Lawrence, to head the India Office.
With the dawn of the atomic age in August and Japan's surrender, London's
primary concern in India was how to find the political solution to the
Hindu-Muslim conflict that would most expeditiously permit the British raj to
withdraw its forces and to extricate as many of its assets as possible from
what seemed to the Labour Party to have become more of an imperial burden and liability than any real advantage for Great Britain.
No comments:
Post a Comment